The pension insurance companies announced information on the investments in securities by issuers

As of 31 March 2011, all pension insurance companies announced on their web sites information about the volume and structure of the investments by types of assets and securities issuers for each managed supplementary pension insurance fund. The information is disclosed in accordance with Art. 180 of the Social Insurance Code and the Requirements to the advertising and written information materials of the pension funds and of the pension insurance companies under Art. 123i, para 2 and Art. 180, para 2, Item 1 and Item  2 of the Social Insurance Code.

At 31.12.2010, the investments of all pension funds in debt instruments (bonds) were in overall 11 types of debt securities and 228 different issues, evaluated at the market value of BGN 1 761 111 030. The bonds occupied a share of 45.04% of the balance sheet assets of the universal pension funds, 41.27% of the balance sheet assets of the occupational pension funds, 41.59% of the balance sheet assets of the voluntary pension funds and 47.02% of the balance sheet assets of the voluntary pension funds under occupational schemes.

As of 31 December 2010, the investments of all pension funds in shares and other equity instruments were in overall 9 types of equity securities and 344 different issues evaluated at market value of BGN 1 055 964 344. The equity financial instruments account for 25.20%  share of the balance sheet assets of the universal pension funds, 28.23% of the balance sheet assets of the occupational pension funds, 31.20% of the balance sheet assets of the voluntary pension funds and 4.25% of the balance sheet assets of the voluntary pension funds under occupational schemes.

The data on the investments in 228 issues of debt and 344 issues of equity financial instruments at the end of 2010, in comparison with 184 issues of debt and 235 issues of equity financial instruments at the end of 2009, were indicative of the running of diversification processes in the pension funds through investments in a bigger number of issues, which if  appropriately combined had to result in reduction of the risk to the individual issuers and more optimal investment of the funds as rate of return-risk ratio.

THE PENSION FUNDS’ ASSETS REVIEW AND THE INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE BALANCE SHEET REVIEW TOGETHER WITH THE STRESS TESTS ON THE INSURERS AND REINSURERS SHOW THAT THE INSURANCE AND THE PENSION INSURANCE SECTORS IN BULGARIA ARE STABLE

Today, on February 3, 2017 the Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) published the Reports containing data on the results of the Bulgarian Pension Funds’ Assets Review (PFAR) and of the Insurance/reinsurance Balance Sheet Review (IBSR), as well as data on the results of the conducted Stress Tests of Insurers and Reinsurers. Information on the results of the reviews of insurers/reinsurers and of pension funds is provided by the independent external reviewers and is summarized by international consulting company Regional Consortium Ernst&Young.
 
The reviews of the pension funds’ assets and of the balance sheets of insurance companies are conducted pursuant to § 10 of the Transitional and Final provisions of the Law on Recovery and Resolution of Credit Institutions and Investment Firms and in line with the approved methodologies by the FSC and the Steering Committee (SC). The FSC and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority – EIOPA, participate in the SC as Voting Members and the Ministry of Finance, the Bulgarian National Bank, the European Commission and the European Securities and Markets Authority – ESMA, participate as Observers.
Pension Funds’ Assets Review and Insurance Balance Sheet Review were performed in the period from 15 July 2016 until the end of January 2017.
All FSC decisions regarding the organization, monitoring and control of the review process were adopted in full consensus with the Steering Committee decisions.

BULGARIAN INSURANCE SECTOR REMAINED ABOVE 100% OF THE CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Solvency II framework, in force since 1 January 2016, introduced higher capital requirements for the insurance industry as well as a different framework for reporting and assessment of risks. The full-scope reviewof the balance sheets of the Bulgarian insurers in the very first year of the introduction of the Solvency II regime provides a competitive advantage for the Bulgarian industry. This review enhances the credibility of the industry and allows the companies and the FSC to better focus their efforts in the right areas of weakness. 
To ensure consistency of the results across insurance companies, the project manager team made an extensive effort to compare and analyze their portfolios instrument by instrument. Both Solvency II and IFRS are principle-based standards and involve the use of judgement. Complete comparability will never be possible in practice. On the other hand, judgement has to be supported by sufficient evidence and be reasonable given the circumstances at the time the judgement is made. Having this in mind the Steering Committee asked the project management team to make an assessment of the situations where economic reality of similar transactions and events was not understood in a similar way. This consistency assessment will be taken into consideration when the follow-up measures are enforced.
 
The Insurance Balance Sheet Review shows an aggregated Solvency Capital requirement (SCR) ratio of 154% and an aggregated Minimum Capital requirement (MCR) ratio of 308% for the solo entities before the impact of the consistency procedures. After the consistency checks performed by the project manager, the aggregated Solvency Capital Ratio(SCR) is 157% and the aggregatedMinimum Capital Ratio(MCR) is 313% for solo entities, SCR for Non- Life being 147% and MCR 333% while for Life sector SCR was 235% and MCR was 238%, groups/sub groups SCR standing at 107% and MCR 187%, all above the prudential requirements.
For a number of 13undertakings, the total available own funds to cover SCR and/or MCR as at 30.06.2016 was insufficient. For those companies at a deficit, the total amount of the MCR deficit was BGN 25 million, and the total amount of the SCR deficit was BGN 50 million BGN. It should be however noted, that these deficits are relatively small to the capital requirements and the available own funds of the insurance sector – the aggregate Solvency Capital Requirement is BGN 1.2 billion and the aggregate own funds available to cover it – BGN 1.9 billion.
Out of the 13 companies, which had a deficit as at 30.06.2016, 7insurers already undertook the necessary actions to increase their own funds to the required level in accordance with the results from the balance sheet review. Another part of the remaining undertakings also took actions, which have lead to strengthening of their capital base although still not fully sufficient. Such actions included capital increases, attracting of subordinated debt as well as sale of financial instruments. Considering the effects of the said subsequent actions, this SCR deficit has been narrowed to BGN 17 million and the MCR deficit – to BGN 22 million to present date. As a result, recovery follow-up actions will be imposed by the FSC to 5 insurance undertakings, which jointly have a market share of 1.49% in the market premium income. These 5 undertakings will have 3 months to raise their own funds to cover their Minimum Capital Requirement, and another three months to cover their Solvency Capital Requirement. Two more insurers will have to present to the FSC progress reports setting out measures taken and progress made to meet the Solvency Capital Requirement by the end of 2017 benefitting from the transitional period to comply with the Solvency II regime.
It is worth noting that the balance sheet review revealed an adequacy of the levels of technical provisions of the insurance sector. In fact the review has lead to proposals by the external reviewers for a decrease of the technical provisions to an aggregate amount of BGN 209 million in the non-life sector and BGN 22 million in the life sector.
The stress-test, which was performed for the insurance sector, is in its very last stage of finalization.   The tested scenarios were adverse market conditions (double-hit scenario), earthquake stress, a flood stress and a provisions deficiency stress. One pre-defined scenario for the Life (re) insurance entities was set as the longevity stress. Total aggregation was not required as all stresses are considered to be independent from each other. The preliminary results reveal that overall the market stress scenario, testing adverse conditions at a global level, has the most significant impact on aggregated own funds. This scenario had a negative impact on the aggregated balance sheet of stress test participants of 15.8% (m BGN 313) of the total excess of assets over liabilities. The provision deficiency test results in 14% devaluation of own funds, with the MTPL related scenarios producing the most significant losses, given the dominance of the MTPL insurance portfolio across the Bulgarian insurancemarket. The provisions deficiency and the earthquake and flood stress scenarios, resulted in an impact of 5,8% and 8,9% decrease in the excess of assets over liabilities respectively. The (re) insurance entities showed resilience to the longevity scenario with a 0,7% increase in the excess of assets over liabilities at a solo level. The FSC will carefully analyse the results both at aggregate and individual level and will proceed with the necessary measures to increase the resilience of the Bulgarian insurance industry.

THE SUPPLEMENTARY PENSION INSURANCE IN BULGARIA IS SUSTAINABLE
The results indicate sustainability of the supplementary pension insurance sector. The pension funds’ assets are available and are kept in the custodian banks in accordance with the regulatory requirements. No deviations from the applicable regulatory framework have been identified in regard to the review of investments in related parties. The general conclusion of the independent external reviewers (IER) is that pension insurance companies meet the regulatory requirements (Ordinance 9 of the FSC) upon performing the assessments of the pension funds’ assets.
The PFAR encompassed all 18 supplementary obligatory pension insurance funds in Bulgaria (universal and professional) and all 9 supplementary voluntary pension insurance funds. The total value of the assets reviewed amounts to over 93% of the funds’ assets.
The PFAR results reflect the need of adjustments, which for the whole sector amount to BGN 33 mln. or 0,3% of the assets of the reviewed 27 PF as of 30 June 2016. The proposed adjustments relate to two categories of assets, owned by part of the PF and are due to differences in the methodology for valuation of investment properties by the different IERs and to the measurement of the risk premium for some corporate bonds issues. FSC will ask the undertakings to reflect the adjustments in the calculation of net asset value at the reference date. Those adjustments shall be confirmed by audit in compliance with the principles of International Financial Reporting Standards and shall be reflected in the financial statements of the pension funds for 2016, taking into account subsequent events occurring after June 30 2016, influencing subsequent valuation of pension fund assets.

The summary report in English and Bulgarian on the results of the Insurance and Pensions’ Reviews can be viewed on FSC’s Website in Bulgarian:
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19637_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19638_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19653_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19654_file.pdf

 
and in English:
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19639_file.pdf

https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19640_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19656_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19657_file.pdf

The full report in English can be found on EIOPA’s Website – https://eiopa.europa.eu/Publications/Other%20Documents/IBSR_Insurance%20Balance%20Sheet%20Review%20of%20the%20Bulgarian%20Insurance%20Sector.pdf.

THE PENSION FUNDS’ ASSETS REVIEW AND THE INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE BALANCE SHEET REVIEW TOGETHER WITH THE STRESS TESTS ON THE INSURERS AND REINSURERS SHOW THAT THE INSURANCE AND THE PENSION INSURANCE SECTORS IN BULGARIA ARE STABLE

Today, on February 3, 2017 the Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) published the Reports containing data on the results of the Bulgarian Pension Funds’ Assets Review (PFAR) and of the Insurance/reinsurance Balance Sheet Review (IBSR), as well as data on the results of the conducted Stress Tests of Insurers and Reinsurers. Information on the results of the reviews of insurers/reinsurers and of pension funds is provided by the independent external reviewers and is summarized by international consulting company Regional Consortium Ernst&Young.
 
The reviews of the pension funds’ assets and of the balance sheets of insurance companies are conducted pursuant to § 10 of the Transitional and Final provisions of the Law on Recovery and Resolution of Credit Institutions and Investment Firms and in line with the approved methodologies by the FSC and the Steering Committee (SC). The FSC and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority – EIOPA, participate in the SC as Voting Members and the Ministry of Finance, the Bulgarian National Bank, the European Commission and the European Securities and Markets Authority – ESMA, participate as Observers.
Pension Funds’ Assets Review and Insurance Balance Sheet Review were performed in the period from 15 July 2016 until the end of January 2017.
All FSC decisions regarding the organization, monitoring and control of the review process were adopted in full consensus with the Steering Committee decisions.
Bulgarian insurance sector remained above 100% of the capital requirements
 
The Solvency II framework, in force since 1 January 2016, introduced higher capital requirements for the insurance industry as well as a different framework for reporting and assessment of risks. The full-scope reviewof the balance sheets of the Bulgarian insurers in the very first year of the introduction of the Solvency II regime provides a competitive advantage for the Bulgarian industry. This review enhances the credibility of the industry and allows the companies and the FSC to better focus their efforts in the right areas of weakness. 
To ensure consistency of the results across insurance companies, the project manager team made an extensive effort to compare and analyze their portfolios instrument by instrument. Both Solvency II and IFRS are principle-based standards and involve the use of judgement. Complete comparability will never be possible in practice. On the other hand, judgement has to be supported by sufficient evidence and be reasonable given the circumstances at the time the judgement is made. Having this in mind the Steering Committee asked the project management team to make an assessment of the situations where economic reality of similar transactions and events was not understood in a similar way. This consistency assessment will be taken into consideration when the follow-up measures are enforced.
 
 
The Insurance Balance Sheet Review shows an aggregated Solvency Capital requirement (SCR) ratio of 154% and an aggregated Minimum Capital requirement (MCR) ratio of 308% for the solo entities before the impact of the consistency procedures. After the consistency checks performed by the project manager, the aggregated Solvency Capital Ratio(SCR) is 157% and the aggregatedMinimum Capital Ratio(MCR) is 313% for solo entities, SCR for Non- Life being 147% and MCR 333% while for Life sector SCR was 235% and MCR was 238%, groups/sub groups SCR standing at 107% and MCR 187%, all above the prudential requirements.
For a number of 13undertakings, the total available own funds to cover SCR and/or MCR as at 30.06.2016 was insufficient. For those companies at a deficit, the total amount of the MCR deficit was BGN 25 million, and the total amount of the SCR deficit was BGN 50 million BGN. It should be however noted, that these deficits are relatively small to the capital requirements and the available own funds of the insurance sector – the aggregate Solvency Capital Requirement is BGN 1.2 billion and the aggregate own funds available to cover it – BGN 1.9 billion.
Out of the 13 companies, which had a deficit as at 30.06.2016, 7insurers already undertook the necessary actions to increase their own funds to the required level in accordance with the results from the balance sheet review. Another part of the remaining undertakings also took actions, which have lead to strengthening of their capital base although still not fully sufficient. Such actions included capital increases, attracting of subordinated debt as well as sale of financial instruments. Considering the effects of the said subsequent actions, this SCR deficit has been narrowed to BGN 17 million and the MCR deficit – to BGN 22 million to present date. As a result, recovery follow-up actions will be imposed by the FSC to 5 insurance undertakings, which jointly have a market share of 1.49% in the market premium income. These 5 undertakings will have 3 months to raise their own funds to cover their Minimum Capital Requirement, and another three months to cover their Solvency Capital Requirement. Two more insurers will have to present to the FSC progress reports setting out measures taken and progress made to meet the Solvency Capital Requirement by the end of 2017 benefitting from the transitional period to comply with the Solvency II regime.
It is worth noting that the balance sheet review revealed an adequacy of the levels of technical provisions of the insurance sector. In fact the review has lead to proposals by the external reviewers for a decrease of the technical provisions to an aggregate amount of BGN 209 million in the non-life sector and BGN 22 million in the life sector.
The stress-test, which was performed for the insurance sector, is in its very last stage of finalization.   The tested scenarios were adverse market conditions (double-hit scenario), earthquake stress, a flood stress and a provisions deficiency stress. One pre-defined scenario for the Life (re) insurance entities was set as the longevity stress. Total aggregation was not required as all stresses are considered to be independent from each other. The preliminary results reveal that overall the market stress scenario, testing adverse conditions at a global level, has the most significant impact on aggregated own funds. This scenario had a negative impact on the aggregated balance sheet of stress test participants of 15.8% (m BGN 313) of the total excess of assets over liabilities. The provision deficiency test results in 14% devaluation of own funds, with the MTPL related scenarios producing the most significant losses, given the dominance of the MTPL insurance portfolio across the Bulgarian insurancemarket. The provisions deficiency and the earthquake and flood stress scenarios, resulted in an impact of 5,8% and 8,9% decrease in the excess of assets over liabilities respectively. The (re) insurance entities showed resilience to the longevity scenario with a 0,7% increase in the excess of assets over liabilities at a solo level. The FSC will carefully analyse the results both at aggregate and individual level and will proceed with the necessary measures to increase the resilience of the Bulgarian insurance industry.
THE SUPPLEMENTARY PENSION INSURANCE IN BULGARIA IS SUSTAINABLE
 
The results indicate sustainability of the supplementary pension insurance sector. The pension funds’ assets are available and are kept in the custodian banks in accordance with the regulatory requirements. No deviations from the applicable regulatory framework have been identified in regard to the review of investments in related parties. The general conclusion of the independent external reviewers (IER) is that pension insurance companies meet the regulatory requirements (Ordinance 9 of the FSC) upon performing the assessments of the pension funds’ assets.
The PFAR encompassed all 18 supplementary obligatory pension insurance funds in Bulgaria (universal and professional) and all 9 supplementary voluntary pension insurance funds. The total value of the assets reviewed amounts to over 93% of the funds’ assets.
The PFAR results reflect the need of adjustments, which for the whole sector amount to BGN 33 mln. or 0,3% of the assets of the reviewed 27 PF as of 30 June 2016. The proposed adjustments relate to two categories of assets, owned by part of the PF and are due to differences in the methodology for valuation of investment properties by the different IERs and to the measurement of the risk premium for some corporate bonds issues. FSC will ask the undertakings to reflect the adjustments in the calculation of net asset value at the reference date. Those adjustments shall be confirmed by audit in compliance with the principles of International Financial Reporting Standards and shall be reflected in the financial statements of the pension funds for 2016, taking into account subsequent events occurring after June 30 2016, influencing subsequent valuation of pension fund assets.
The summary report in English and Bulgarian on the results of the Insurance and Pensions’ Reviews can be viewed on FSC’s Website in Bulgarian: https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19637_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19638_file.pdf
 
and in English: https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19639_file.pdf
https://www.fsc.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/files/19640_file.pdf
The full report in English can be found on EIOPA’s Website.
 
 
 

The National Assembly elected the vice-chairpersons of the Financial Supervision Commission

On the 15th of May, the National Assembly elected Denitsa Velichkova as Deputy Chair of the Investment Supervision Division, Diana Yordanova as Deputy Chair of the Social Insurance Supervision Division and Plamen Danailov as Deputy Chair of the Insurance Supervision Division.

From the parliamentary rostrum, the Chairman of the Financial Supervision Commission, Mr. Vasil Golemanski, presented the candidates for Deputy Chairpersons, highlighting their years of extensive professional experience within the structures of the state administration and the financial sector. He emphasized their readiness for open and constructive dialogue. In accordance with the selection procedure, they were also presented by him on April 29th to the Budget and Finance Committee, which listened to their concepts for the development of the three supervising sectors and their views on their future responsibilities.

Regarding the supervision of investment activity, Ms.Velichkova outlined three main areas – regulatory activity and control, increasing investor confidence in the capital market in Bulgaria and increasing financial literacy in order to ensure sustainable and transparent development of the financial sector; „I believe that the main directions for the development of the Bulgarian financial market are related to increasing liquidity, ensuring the possibility of financing new companies through the capital market, accelerating the growth of the economy in the medium term and improving the image of Bulgaria on the international map of regulators in the non-banking financial sector, and, of course, as an extremely important priority, better positioning of Bulgaria on the „investment map of Europe“. My key messages to the investment community are dialogue, interaction, partnership, because I believe that regulatory activity is not an end in itself, but a two-way process of building trust and a predictable environment for business. I want to stress that the most important end result is to improve Bulgaria’s image as a place for good investments.“

Furthermore, she elaborated her concept with synchronising regulatory frameworks with European standards, creating the necessary conditions to facilitate retail investor’s access to investments in government securities, reducing administrative and regulatory burdens, introducing digital solutions, rigorously enforcing key components of ESG policies and fostering a better investment culture over the long term by introducing specialised education in educational institutions.

For the development of the Social Insurance Supervision Division, Ms. Yordanova will follow and defend the maintenance of beneficial and constructive dialogue based on professionally substantiated convictions; active cooperation with the legislative and executive authorities, industry organizations, sector representatives and social partners; participation in initiatives to increase financial awareness among the public and consumer satisfaction. She confidently stated that „social responsibility, high professionalism and committed partnership are the guarantees for  clear and durable regulatory framework that contributes to the sustainable development of the pension system in Bulgaria, respectively an indisputably necessary mechanism for ensuring the adequacy and stability of public finances“. She specified that from now on she will impose a standard for conducting a predictable and consistent regulatory and supervisory policy, „the consequences of which are stability and trust in the supplementary pension insurance sector – a sector of the highest public importance.“ It became clear from her presentation that the dynamics in the development of capital markets and the possibilities for diversification of savings of people of working age increasingly require providing consumers of pension insurance services and products with a choice between different investment strategies, taking into account their life cycle and risk tolerance: „By creating funds with different investment profiles and improving incentives for investment management, including reducing fees and deductions, better results are achievable. This conclusion is indisputable and is based on the data published annually by the OECD. From a supervisory standpoint, guaranteeing the funds of insured individuals, including in unfavorable economic conditions and the effective distribution of biometric risk in relation to those receiving payments is of particularly high priority.“

Regarding insurance supervision, Mr. Danailov shared that his strategic priorities are related to the creation of a predictable and transparent legislative initiative, support for innovation and new products, focus on consumer protection, a stable and financially sustainable insurance market, „which can respond to the challenges we are facing.“ He stated that he would work on the digitalization of the sector, from the perspective of the development of online insurance, the creation of digital platforms and mobile applications, the use of the possibilities of artificial intelligence to reduce the administrative burden, because „the sector requires modern regulatory solutions, predictability and consistency in actions, in view of the entire dynamics of the economy and society.“

During his presentation, he touched upon the topics of the „bonus-malus“ system, the „green card“, double auditing of insurance companies, climate change, the adoption of European directives, compliance with ESG standards and the principles of good corporate governance, their impact on insurance activity, digital risks from the perspective of cyber insurance, as well as raising financial literacy in all the directions described above. For the  management of insurance supervision, he said: „The insurance sector is a highly specific and interesting area because, by its very nature, it embodies a promise of compensation when certain adverse events occur that no one wants to occur. This promise involves a great deal of trust, which means effective and well-functioning supervision. The main function of supervision is to protect the interests of users, of people who have policies, whether individuals or legal entities, to monitor the financial soundness, transparency and efficiency of insurance and reinsurance companies, but the main focus is on the users of these services.“

After the vote, Mrs. Velichkova, Mrs.Yordanova and Mr. Danailov swore an oath in Parliament and thanked the members of the Parliament from the tribune for the vote of confidence.

You can see full FSC Board here.

The minimum return rate of the supplementary pension funds set for the period from 01.01.2003 to 31.12.2004.

he Deputy Chairman of the FSC, Head of Social Insurance Division set the minimum return rate of the supplementary pension funds for the period from 01.01.2003 to 31.12.2004. The minimum return rate is 6.62% for the occupational pension funds and 6.73% for the universal pension funds. For the 2-year period from 01.01.2003 to 31.12.2004 mandatory pension funds had a higher than the minimum announced return rate. Neither of the funds had more than the average weighted return rate limit at which  a reserve is set aside in the pension fund to guarantee the minimum profitability

The minimum return rate for the universal and occupational pension funds has been determined

The Deputy Chairman of FSC, Head of  Social Insurance Supervision Division  Bisser Petkov determined the minimum return rate of 7.46% on annual basis  for  the management of the assets of universal pension funds for the preceding 24-months period (01/04/2002 – 31/03/2004). The minimum return rate for the management of the assets of occupational  pension funds for the same period is 6.88% on annual basis.

The minimum return rate for the universal and occupational pension funds announced

The Deputy Chairman of FSC, Head of  Social Insurance Supervision Division  Bisser Petkov determined the minimum return rate of 7.04% on annual basis  for  the management of the assets of universal pension funds for the preceding 24-months period (01/10/2002 – 30/09/2004). The minimum return rate for the management of the assets of occupational pension funds for the same period is 6.86% on annual basis.


 

The minimum rate of return was determined of the compulsory pension funds for the period from 31.03.2009 to 31.03.2011

The minimum rate of return on a year-on-year basis for the preceding 24-month period from 31.03.2009 to 31.03.2011 was   
4,79 percent from the management of the assets of the universal pension funds (UPF). Regarding the occupational pension funds (OPF), a minimum rate of return on an annual basis of 4,90 percent was determined for the same period. The weighted average rate of return of UPFs for the same period, calculated on an annual basis, was 7,98 per cent, and for OPF, respectively, it was 8,16 percent. All compulsory supplementary pension insurance funds reached a rate of return whose amount exceeded the set minimum level of rate of return for the relevant type of fund.

For the above indicated 24-month period, UPF Badeshte achieved a rate of return, which was higher than the announced upper limit of the rate of return of the universal funds and it should put aside a reserve within the statutorily set term.

The management body of the Financial Supervision Commission hosted an official meeting with the Chairperson of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA)

The Chairperson of the Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) Mr. Boyko Atanasov, as well as its Vice Chair in charge of the Insurance Supervision Division Mr. Vladimir Savov and the Vice Chair in charge of the Social Insurance Supervision Division Ms. Diana Yordanova held an official meeting with the Chairperson of EIOPA Ms. Petra Hielkema.

MicrosoftTeams image 1 scaled

During the meeting, they discussed the strategic priorities in two main aspects of the non-banking sector, namely the insurance and the pension insurance area. The FSC management body emphasized its readiness to cooperate with EIOPA within the framework of various committees, working groups, as well as when attempting to achieve common goals in order to secure financial stability in both the insurance and pension insurance area.

The FSC management body expressed its gratitude to the European institution for its continuous efforts aimed at boosting the expertise of the national regulators. Due to its specialized trainings, the FSC officers will continue with their participations in various events organized by EIOPA which are meant to improve and enlarge their supervisory capacity.

Both institutions agreed upon their joint priorities set by them, namely digitalization, sustainable finance, effective cooperation at the EU level, financial innovations and consumers’ protection, as well as their synchronized functioning aimed at achieving stronger convergence in the EU, as regards the specified issues.

On its part, EIOPA emphasized its preparedness to support the national regulators, more precisely the FSC needs, and to facilitate the achievement of the common EU priorities. Both authorities agreed on the concept that the forthcoming new legislation dedicated to the Solvency II review, the future insurance recovery and resolution framework (IRRD), the digitalization and the sustainable finance poses a new challenge, which has to be met based on the developed partnership.

DSC 0004 1 scaled

“In 2022 the FSC commenced a new strategic period. In the course of it, we shall continue to be of consumers’ use through effective communication, unbiased decisions and foreseeable actions. Our present-day meeting makes us more self-confident due to the successful partnership with EIOPA and the shared professional experiences” pointed out Mr. Boyko Atanasov.